About Me

Name: F. Garcia
Email: garciaf1az@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Let's Not Get Offended Too Quickly!

Last week I was forwarded a series of articles from DiversityInc on a list of things not to say to number of minority groups, including Latinos, African Americans, women, etc.  I read through the articles and found that many of the things that you shouldn't say to any of the groups were not really offensive.   For the most part they may have shown a lack education, understanding or just plain thoughtless.  There is no need to get offended or assume that the person who made the statement or raised the question is bad intentioned, racist, prejudiced or evil.  We should simply acknowledge that we have done the exact same, if not worse. 
 
Here is the list of statements which we are told not say to Latinos.  I have put my take on them.  To get perspective from DiversityInc on this or the other groups, you can visit their website at www.diversityinc.com
1. "Don't worry, you'll get the promotion, you're Latino/a."

This is my issue with Affirmative Action.  If you are in a university setting, for example, and you got in due to connections your family has, no one will know (especially, if you are white). But if it is understood that the university has an affirmation action program and you are Hispanic or African American, it may be assumed that you got in as a result of this program and not your own merit. As people of color we cannot escape that reality. For that reason, I believe that we should hire, promote, fire, discipline, etc. based on the individual’s merits and not with any other consideration in terms of their ethnicity.  For minorities, we should seek to rid ourselves of any perception that we received something not due to our merits but simply because of our minority status.  There may have been a time for Affirmative Action, but today it is no longer needed.

 2. "When did you arrive in this country?"

This is not a horrible question. Answer it and then ask the person when they themselves got here.  It becomes pretty obvious to them what a silly question that was.  I have asked this question of a number of cab drivers and none of them took offense.  In fact, they did just as I suggest.  It leads to a good conversation about our backgrounds. 

3. "Hola! Habla Ingles?"

I agree with DiversityInc's answer.. Just speak English.  If they don’t understand you, it will be come obvious.
4. "Do you live with your parents?"

I would guess this is a very rare question? More than likely it is asked of younger people. It could be easily asked of any young person, regardless of their race or ethnicity. The fact that this is taken as an ‘offense’ just talks to how easy it is for many minorities to take anything said to be with bad intent.

5. "You're not like them."

I wouldn’t take offense to this until I understood what they meant by it. For example, if I am not a Democrat, pro illegal immigration and in favor of bi-lingual education, they may be right, I may not be like a majority of Hispanics.  If anything this may speak to the expectations set by the appearance of the monolithic Latino perspective at times.  If we had a greater diversity of thought and opinion across the broad spectrum of social and political issues, perhaps we would be more difficult to pigeonhole.  I was reading an article in Hispanic magazine and the question was why the Latino vote had dropped off the radar screen.  There are two reasons I can think of: (1) we don't vote so regardless of our numbers we can be taken for  granted, and (2) we are a one issue voting bloc (immigration).  When we actually vote and have a broader perspective beyond immigration, perhaps politicians will take us more seriously. 

6. "Can you show me your knife?"

The fact that a one time incident from 20 years ago even made this list goes to show that we’re reaching to find things that could possibly offend Latinos. 

 7. "Why don't all you Latinos stop doing that?"

It’s the flip side of the same coin when minorities lump whites into the same category and assume that they have a monolithic worldview.

 8. "You're not white."

I’ll bet that if you ask Latino’s if they categorize themselves as Caucasian, 9 out of 10 would say no. This has to more do with understanding the federal racial/ethnic categories, not a slight against Hispanics.

 9. Butchering a Latino's last name.

I find it interesting that Hispanics expect other Americans to pronounce their names correctly, especially if they have names that are very traditional or are difficult to pronounce in English. I am not sure why Greeks, Russians, Germans, etc. have been able to traverse this issue without it becoming a real problem. In addition, when Hispanics who do not speak English fluently do not pronounce English names correctly, should these individuals whose names 'have been butchered' take personal offense? We have a country of great diversity of languages, if you prefer to use the proper pronunciation and accent from the country of origin, you should expect that many will not understand you or will have trouble pronouncing it.   

10. "Do you speak Spanish?"

This is simply being curious if you speak another language. There is no ‘code’ to determine how ‘hispanic’ someone is.  This is now bordering on paranoia when you think other Latinos are assessing your "Latinoness" based on your ability to speak the language.  Spanish is a beautiful language.  I don't get to use it every day, sometimes I simply look forward to having a conversation in Spanish.  Anytime someone asks me this, this is how I take it.  I have asked this question myself for this reason.
 
God Bless.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Man v. Beasts: There Is A Difference

Let me begin by stating that I too feel for the senseless slaughter of animals.  My Judeo-Christian values stress that we respect all life since all life emanates from God.  That means that the animals which we consume need to be killed with as much respect as possible before they get to our tables.
 
I read an article on NPR entititled, Chronicling The Virunga Gorilla Murders by Brent Stirton (June 23, 2008).  I had heard the title announced on the NPR broadcast in the morning and found it troubling.  The death of an animal may be described as a killing, a slaugther, sacrifice, etc.  It must not be referred to as murder.  Murder is the taking of another person's life.  Animals are not people and we should not confuse them as such.  They may be beloved pets or endangered species but ultimately they are only animals.
 
We, as humans, with our ability to think, not just instinctually, but with human sophistry and with a moral perspective, are above animals. 
 
In the 1980s I listened to The Smiths.  Their seminal album was called Meat Is Murder.  Though I enjoyed their music, even then, as an impressionable young man, did not buy into the radical philosophy which that title and Morrissey's (the lead singer) opinion put forth.
 
More recently we have seen the PETA ad which equated the killing of chickens with the holocaust.  Such intellectual barbarity cannot be allowed to stand.  My hope is that any thinking or moral person would look at that ad and see it for what it is, garbage.  Complete and utter garbage.  It is not only a defamation of the Jewish people, but of all human life.  My life has a greater impact in the world than that of a chicken.  My fear is that many may have agreed or at least 'felt' the message of the ad.
 
We have seen the opposite labeling of the murderers which have massacred people in schools and shopping malls.  In these circumstances the term used to describe them is 'shooters'.  Shooters may describe what you do at the state fair to win some prizes, but it does not describe the devastating act committed by these local terrorists.  It is just a troubling to have them added in the count of the victims of the crime they themselves perpetrated.
 
We heard similar reactions and sentiments in the tiger mauling in the San Francisco zoo last year.  Many felt the victims of the attack deserved it for having taunted the tiger.  That's quite a price to pay for having done something silly.  This discussion helped to detract the conversation about how the animal came to escape it's holding structure.  The clincher came when newspaper articles listed the tiger's name while not listing the names of the human victims.
 
In the article on the Virunga gorillas, the author went on to describe the scene where the gorillas were being removed from the jungle.  "I've never seen that degree of stoicism, or sobriety, or somberness... even when people were collecting the bodies of humans, when I've seen massacre sites."  The killing of these gorillas was near Rwanda where hundreds of thousands of men, women and children were murdered like animals.  That the author interprets the reaction as more somber than the Rwandan genocide is deeply troubling, if not the mere interpretation then perhaps the actual reaction by those Africans who were removing the dead gorillas.
Language is important.  It helps us to become comfortable or uncomfortable with people, places or events in the world.  Let's confine murder to the taking of life of another human, not an animal.
 
God Bless
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »