About Me

Name: F. Garcia
Email: garciaf1az@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Let's Not Get Offended Too Quickly!

Last week I was forwarded a series of articles from DiversityInc on a list of things not to say to number of minority groups, including Latinos, African Americans, women, etc.  I read through the articles and found that many of the things that you shouldn't say to any of the groups were not really offensive.   For the most part they may have shown a lack education, understanding or just plain thoughtless.  There is no need to get offended or assume that the person who made the statement or raised the question is bad intentioned, racist, prejudiced or evil.  We should simply acknowledge that we have done the exact same, if not worse. 
 
Here is the list of statements which we are told not say to Latinos.  I have put my take on them.  To get perspective from DiversityInc on this or the other groups, you can visit their website at www.diversityinc.com
1. "Don't worry, you'll get the promotion, you're Latino/a."

This is my issue with Affirmative Action.  If you are in a university setting, for example, and you got in due to connections your family has, no one will know (especially, if you are white). But if it is understood that the university has an affirmation action program and you are Hispanic or African American, it may be assumed that you got in as a result of this program and not your own merit. As people of color we cannot escape that reality. For that reason, I believe that we should hire, promote, fire, discipline, etc. based on the individual’s merits and not with any other consideration in terms of their ethnicity.  For minorities, we should seek to rid ourselves of any perception that we received something not due to our merits but simply because of our minority status.  There may have been a time for Affirmative Action, but today it is no longer needed.

 2. "When did you arrive in this country?"

This is not a horrible question. Answer it and then ask the person when they themselves got here.  It becomes pretty obvious to them what a silly question that was.  I have asked this question of a number of cab drivers and none of them took offense.  In fact, they did just as I suggest.  It leads to a good conversation about our backgrounds. 

3. "Hola! Habla Ingles?"

I agree with DiversityInc's answer.. Just speak English.  If they don’t understand you, it will be come obvious.
4. "Do you live with your parents?"

I would guess this is a very rare question? More than likely it is asked of younger people. It could be easily asked of any young person, regardless of their race or ethnicity. The fact that this is taken as an ‘offense’ just talks to how easy it is for many minorities to take anything said to be with bad intent.

5. "You're not like them."

I wouldn’t take offense to this until I understood what they meant by it. For example, if I am not a Democrat, pro illegal immigration and in favor of bi-lingual education, they may be right, I may not be like a majority of Hispanics.  If anything this may speak to the expectations set by the appearance of the monolithic Latino perspective at times.  If we had a greater diversity of thought and opinion across the broad spectrum of social and political issues, perhaps we would be more difficult to pigeonhole.  I was reading an article in Hispanic magazine and the question was why the Latino vote had dropped off the radar screen.  There are two reasons I can think of: (1) we don't vote so regardless of our numbers we can be taken for  granted, and (2) we are a one issue voting bloc (immigration).  When we actually vote and have a broader perspective beyond immigration, perhaps politicians will take us more seriously. 

6. "Can you show me your knife?"

The fact that a one time incident from 20 years ago even made this list goes to show that we’re reaching to find things that could possibly offend Latinos. 

 7. "Why don't all you Latinos stop doing that?"

It’s the flip side of the same coin when minorities lump whites into the same category and assume that they have a monolithic worldview.

 8. "You're not white."

I’ll bet that if you ask Latino’s if they categorize themselves as Caucasian, 9 out of 10 would say no. This has to more do with understanding the federal racial/ethnic categories, not a slight against Hispanics.

 9. Butchering a Latino's last name.

I find it interesting that Hispanics expect other Americans to pronounce their names correctly, especially if they have names that are very traditional or are difficult to pronounce in English. I am not sure why Greeks, Russians, Germans, etc. have been able to traverse this issue without it becoming a real problem. In addition, when Hispanics who do not speak English fluently do not pronounce English names correctly, should these individuals whose names 'have been butchered' take personal offense? We have a country of great diversity of languages, if you prefer to use the proper pronunciation and accent from the country of origin, you should expect that many will not understand you or will have trouble pronouncing it.   

10. "Do you speak Spanish?"

This is simply being curious if you speak another language. There is no ‘code’ to determine how ‘hispanic’ someone is.  This is now bordering on paranoia when you think other Latinos are assessing your "Latinoness" based on your ability to speak the language.  Spanish is a beautiful language.  I don't get to use it every day, sometimes I simply look forward to having a conversation in Spanish.  Anytime someone asks me this, this is how I take it.  I have asked this question myself for this reason.
 
God Bless.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Man v. Beasts: There Is A Difference

Let me begin by stating that I too feel for the senseless slaughter of animals.  My Judeo-Christian values stress that we respect all life since all life emanates from God.  That means that the animals which we consume need to be killed with as much respect as possible before they get to our tables.
 
I read an article on NPR entititled, Chronicling The Virunga Gorilla Murders by Brent Stirton (June 23, 2008).  I had heard the title announced on the NPR broadcast in the morning and found it troubling.  The death of an animal may be described as a killing, a slaugther, sacrifice, etc.  It must not be referred to as murder.  Murder is the taking of another person's life.  Animals are not people and we should not confuse them as such.  They may be beloved pets or endangered species but ultimately they are only animals.
 
We, as humans, with our ability to think, not just instinctually, but with human sophistry and with a moral perspective, are above animals. 
 
In the 1980s I listened to The Smiths.  Their seminal album was called Meat Is Murder.  Though I enjoyed their music, even then, as an impressionable young man, did not buy into the radical philosophy which that title and Morrissey's (the lead singer) opinion put forth.
 
More recently we have seen the PETA ad which equated the killing of chickens with the holocaust.  Such intellectual barbarity cannot be allowed to stand.  My hope is that any thinking or moral person would look at that ad and see it for what it is, garbage.  Complete and utter garbage.  It is not only a defamation of the Jewish people, but of all human life.  My life has a greater impact in the world than that of a chicken.  My fear is that many may have agreed or at least 'felt' the message of the ad.
 
We have seen the opposite labeling of the murderers which have massacred people in schools and shopping malls.  In these circumstances the term used to describe them is 'shooters'.  Shooters may describe what you do at the state fair to win some prizes, but it does not describe the devastating act committed by these local terrorists.  It is just a troubling to have them added in the count of the victims of the crime they themselves perpetrated.
 
We heard similar reactions and sentiments in the tiger mauling in the San Francisco zoo last year.  Many felt the victims of the attack deserved it for having taunted the tiger.  That's quite a price to pay for having done something silly.  This discussion helped to detract the conversation about how the animal came to escape it's holding structure.  The clincher came when newspaper articles listed the tiger's name while not listing the names of the human victims.
 
In the article on the Virunga gorillas, the author went on to describe the scene where the gorillas were being removed from the jungle.  "I've never seen that degree of stoicism, or sobriety, or somberness... even when people were collecting the bodies of humans, when I've seen massacre sites."  The killing of these gorillas was near Rwanda where hundreds of thousands of men, women and children were murdered like animals.  That the author interprets the reaction as more somber than the Rwandan genocide is deeply troubling, if not the mere interpretation then perhaps the actual reaction by those Africans who were removing the dead gorillas.
Language is important.  It helps us to become comfortable or uncomfortable with people, places or events in the world.  Let's confine murder to the taking of life of another human, not an animal.
 
God Bless
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Long And Arduous Road Back To Liberty

I am here to implore you as conservatives, not necessarily with a capital C, but conservatives in values, be you a Republican, a Democrat, or an Independent, to raise your voice and take this country back. By that I don’t necessarily mean to take back the White House, since it has been in conservative hands for the last two terms; nor the Congress, though it is now controlled by Liberals; nor the Judiciary, which has continued its activism to legislate and seek social justice instead of merely applying or interpreting the law. What I am asking is that we begin the long and arduous task of winning back the soul, the heart and the mind of our freedom loving country.

Liberty and equality are not the same. Our Founding Fathers understood that. The United States has more recently fallen prey to the European ideal of equality. Liberty may not breed equality but it certainly provides the foundation upon which our personal and national dreams rest. Equality does not breed liberty, only a widespread bland uniformity that limits our ability to dream and carry out those dreams. We must strive to remain free to pursue our happiness through the ability to dream, for ourselves, for our families, for our country and for the betterment of this world. Throughout our history, as well as our future, this will be achieved by people having the liberty to succeed and fail. We have done very well in taking care of those who have not found success in our system. Our goal should not be to aspire to the diminished dreams of the less fortunate, but through our successes to raise them up with us.

It is our values that ultimately should help us to make a decision on who should lead our nation. I make the same call to our brethren in the Democratic Party. We may have some different ideas on how to continue to keep this country as the greatest beacon of hope, peace and prosperity in the world, but we should not be divided on that goal. The fate of the world depends on our strength.

Victor Frankl stated it so simply and eloquently in his book, "Man’s Search For Meaning", that the world can be divided into two types of people, the decent and the indecent. Frankl, a Holocaust survivor, saw that there are good and bad people across all other artificial divisions. For me this means that if you are a man, it does not make you as irrelevant as a bicycle to a fish. If you are a woman, it doesn’t mean you are man with a female anatomy. If you are white, it does not make you an oppressor. If you are a minority, it does not make you a victim. If you are rich, it does not mean you only care about money. If you are poor, it does not mean you are unable to lift yourself out of poverty. If you are a Liberal, it doesn’t mean you don’t have standards. If you are a Conservative, it doesn’t mean you don’t have a heart. You are guaranteed to find the best and worst of people on either side.

The debate is over. Education is failing in this country. 40 years of programs, hundreds of billions of dollars, new teaching methods and emphasis on so much else but learning, have led us to a situation where we are far from helping our children to excel. The mantra we hear from the NEA, the ATF and the Department Of Education is "we need more money." They hold our children, and even our teachers, hostage until we give more. The results, however, do not change. I say, "No more." We need to allow state and local communities to determine where and how to spend their education budgets. We need to give parents a choice of where to send their children. Just ask your governmental leaders where they send their children to school. A great number of them send their children to private schools. Why can’t we have the same opportunity? Educational institutions will compete to have the opportunity to educate our children. Competition will breed excellence. Excellence in our schools will lead to the continued role of America as the world leader.

The debate is not over in terms of the environment. We must allow those scientists with a different perspective to voice their opinion. They are not ‘oil industry shills’ just as it is assumed that those that support global warming are not considered ‘environmental shills’. Science is not, and never has been, relegated to consensus. Science must always challenge that which we know, or presume to know, today, only to be challenged again by future scientists. I, like you, care about the environment. I want my children to inherit a world similar to the one I lived in, if not better. I do not, however, subscribe to the hysterical fear mongering which we are fed daily. If environmental prophecies were accurate, we should be living in an ice age by now or would have starved due to over population. At the core of global warming is an attempt to understand the weather, not just today’s weather but weather patterns over centuries and millennia. Climate change has occurred with and without human intervention. This is fact. The complexity of this world is more intricate than a spider’s web. I pray we do not cause greater damage to more change-sensitive parts of the world, specifically the Third World, over an idea that is faulty at best.

I ask that you look at the person next to you, regardless of gender, race, or color and see in them an American. No hyphens necessary. Personally, I do not look to advance Hispanic agendas. I would hope that any other American leader would look to advance our American ideals, not to segment our nation into groups with contradictory goals. E pluribus unum, ‘from many one’, is one of the foundations of this country. The moment we start to re-think the fabric of the American experiment and believe it to mean, ‘from one many’, we will have made great strides to undo the seam of our strength. Let me emphasize, however, that we do need some disunity. We need to have those individuals who will push us forward. There is something to be said for the red and blue states. Without the continued need to improve, innovation ceases and a society will be passed over by others with a need to advance.

We are not a divided America. We are a country of diverse beliefs and ideas, however, we are ultimately Americans and have faced the world as such when the opportunity has presented itself. We are not a racist country; however, racism does exist here. Racism has existed in every society throughout history. We are excellent as human beings in finding the differences which separate us. There are two key things to consider when it comes to racism. First, racist sentiments are not the sole property of whites. I have seen the flip side of racist remarks and attitudes in our minority communities. These racist words, ideas and actions are not only tolerated but accepted due to the fear that calling them for what they truly are is politically incorrect and will itself be taken as a racist reaction. We cannot have two sets of rules in this country, one for whites and one for minorities. Regardless of who says or does something which is racist, it must be recognized for what it is. I expect, and am quite capable of dealing with, true equality. I do not need the condescension from those who feel I need special protection or special programs. I am no more special than the Jews, the Irish, the Germans, the Italians and all the other immigrants which came into this country over the centuries. Secondly, racism is not the greatest obstacle for minorities getting ahead in this country. ‘The’ obstacle is the loss of the values which help us to overcome our challenges. We must learn English, not at the expense of our native language, but well enough to traverse the economic and educational landscape successfully. Ask someone in Bangalore, India how advantageous it is to speak English. Or in the Philippines. English is the accepted business language of the world. To not master it places those individuals in great economic jeopardy. It is that simple. At the core of this is to value education. We must maintain our strong work ethic and strong family values. We should expect to earn everything, and expect nothing for free. There is a high price for getting something for nothing and that is remaining in the same subnormal situation for the long term. That is no fair exchange.

For my Hispanic brethren, let me make this clear, efforts to stem the large amount of illegal immigration are not racist. In a Post 9/11 America we must be concerned with national security. This cannot be understated. It is also fact, that our social systems are being overwhelmed by our illegal population. To be clear again, our illegal immigrants do contribute to our society and our economy. They keep prices low for many goods and services which their labor touches. Consider, however, that there are countless people trying to get into this country from all over the world. I would ask those Hispanics who take offense to tackling the illegal immigration problem to consider how moral it is to keep other people, in far off lands, waiting while others cut in line. If you, as Hispanics, only care about other Hispanics trying to get into this country, you have to question your assertion of social justice as the reason for your position. We must also be concerned about the harrowing nightmare of crossing deserts to get into this country. We cannot be unconcerned about those who lose their lives in search of a better one. Ultimately, we must respect the sovereignty of the U.S.. There is a way into this country, there always has been. Many of us went through that process and are far better off for having done that. A final thought, either you or your ancestors made a decision to come here for a better life. Why would we want to turn this place into the place that we left for its lack of opportunities? Appreciate the greatness of this country. It is your country now.

Finally, we must strive to maintain the religious values upon which this country was founded. There is no established religion here. We are very open to any number of religious beliefs or no religious beliefs. Our ideals, however, come from our Judeo-Christian values. It is these values which allow for our tolerance and acceptance of the many religious beliefs which make up our nation. G.K. Chesterton once said that those who believe in nothing are doomed to believe anything. There is no reason for us to cease believing in this nation and the religious beliefs which are its foundation. I do not seek paradise on earth, but only a place where a greater number of people have the opportunity to live out their dreams. I seek my paradise somewhere other than here after I die. Be careful of those who wish to make their paradise on this earth. We need only to look at our former foes in the Soviet Union to realize what a godless society created. It was no paradise.

We have lost our way. We have not lost our empire, because unlike any other super power in history, we never had one. Instead of taking land we worked to instill the same ideals in other countries. We gave up our own fathers, mothers, sons, daughters, neighbors, everything we had to fight and protect those whose liberty was taken or threatened. It was not all completely altruistic, we did look out for our American interests, however, more than any other country in history we have produced more good than not. We cannot rest. We cannot feel entitled. We must fight for our ideals. We must make sure they are taken forward by our children. This will not happen by default, it is something we have to work hard at. Ultimately, we must remain free, not just from foreign forces but from our own worst natures which would exchange freedom for healthcare, for safety from second hand smoke, from hysterical fears about the weather. We, the people, have done very well handling our freedoms for over 230 years. We do not need a nanny state to ease our freedoms away, the price is too great, for us and for the world.

God Bless,
F. Garcia

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »